Search the Archive

Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this site

Recent Comments

Feeds

Monthly Archives



Your Communities - Local News, Sport & Events in Southport

Epilepsys Affects on Romance

Posted by Administrator on June 9, 2008 10:27 AM | 

Epilepsys Affects on Romance

Contact Stephen Bellini

Website http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/romance-epilepsy

Email Stephen Bellini

About us

Living with epilepsy, people don't always credit us with intelligance because our pills make us slow so how can they see us as romantic?

The aim of this group (as well as having fun) is to discuss and help each other come to a realisation of how our brains work, what are limitations are, and how these can be an asset in society not a restriction.

This is the pinical of coming to an understanding of what our triggers are and how we subconsciously react.

Once we and our nearest and dearest know that it relieves a lot of the trigger pressures of daily living and thus aids us all to improve.

Phsychology is at face value weird but it is of great value in aiding us all to get along and realise how 'we' the individual process and think.

« Lord Street West Church Fun Day | Main | players&teams required for season 2008-09 »

Comments (1)

stephen bellini wrote...

Speaking as an epieptic to all people with, or living with, epileptics. Normal is considered as what is socially and culturally acceptabl, but, social and cultural will change normal thus altering the concerns of cognitive social psychology. !STRANGE AH if you were born with epilepsy you are 'normal' you just have fits - simple enough but, if you have had a bad hit to the head you probably will end up having epilepsy because of brain trauma.

It is from this that (from experiance and a degree course in psychology i speak) i can say, epilepsy is not your (their) problem - it is cognition.

Because of the brain damage the cognition (thinking processing responce time) causes you/them to appear to be not 'normal' thus although they/you may pysically be appealable a patronisation comes in between them/you and the 'partner' and 'we' are made to feel unloveable.

We are viewed as 'ohh' or 'ahh' or 'poor thing' - not 'come here i want you'

This dilemma is further complicated if you end up on sticks/wheelchairs.

Phenomenological phsychology at face value can be most beneficial for understanding and/or revealing an individuals “self� through its uninterrupted methodology through the use of Free Association Narrative Interviewing (FANI) to establish a subjects “self�. This is where there is a difference Basically it is all about and quite simply means,'talk to them/us, give them/us time to process what has been said and to think of a reply. You will be very supprised at how clever people actually are and--how lovable.

WHAT? Simple really, as Socroties once implied 'why should society follow each other like sheep. We all have an opinion and a brain to process our thoughts. Why then should we accept 'normal/fashionable' simply because the majority says it is. Equally, Normal is based on a majority rule so who is right and even if normal (majority of) has an opinion why can't we challenge it and say 'you're wrong?.

I have a different life style to you. Am i wrong or are you, should the answer be based on a survey of 'majority rule (what's normal) or should we accept that we are both right and then look for a common ground that we can both agree to be normal. Why should we be alienated because we have fits. We are quite simply 'normal', yes, the same as you! If given the chance we can hold down a job if allowed to do it in our own time and can be 'normal' if given the chance so hey lets work together on this.

Posted by: stephen bellini  | June 9, 2008 8:08 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)